What’s Happening To Buy-To-Let Mortgage Rates?

The rising popularity of serviced apartments attracts guests seeking hotel-like comforts while maintaining their privacy. To stand out among the competition and increase profitability, it’s crucial to enhance your marketing strategies for your multiple properties in town.

Understanding the disparity between buy-to-let (BTL) and residential mortgages is crucial. While they share similarities, it’s essential to recognize that a residential mortgage is intended for personal residences, whereas a buy-to-let mortgage is designed specifically for investment properties. In this guide, we elucidate the fundamental distinctions between these mortgage categories and address common queries regarding the functionality of buy-to-let mortgages.

What is a buy to let mortgage?

A buy-to-let mortgage is a loan provided by a mortgage lender for purchasing a property intended for renting out to tenants.

What’s the difference between a buy to let and residential mortgage?

A residential mortgage, also known as a buy-to-live mortgage, is a loan obtained from a mortgage lender to purchase a home intended for personal residence. In contrast, a buy-to-let mortgage is a loan acquired from a mortgage lender to buy a property intended for renting out to tenants. Landlords typically opt for buy-to-let mortgages when purchasing properties for rental purposes.

How do buy to let mortgages work

When applying for a residential mortgage, lenders typically assess your borrowing capacity based on your income, usually allowing you to borrow around 4-4.5 times your household income. In contrast, buy-to-let mortgage eligibility hinges more on potential rental income rather than personal earnings. Lenders evaluate average rents in your area and often require rental income to exceed 125% of mortgage payments.

To mitigate the risk of void periods, lenders also consider demand for similar properties in your locality. Despite this emphasis on rental income, your salary remains significant. Generally, a minimum annual income of £25,000 is required for a buy-to-let mortgage, and lenders seek assurance of your ability to afford repayments even in case of interest rate hikes.

A higher salary may influence landlords to be more flexible regarding rental income expectations, as it suggests greater capacity to cover any rental shortfalls during vacancy periods.

What is top slicing?

Top-slicing involves buy-to-let mortgage lenders using your personal income to cover any deficit in borrowing, particularly if the rental income is insufficient. If you’re facing challenges with mortgage payments on an existing buy-to-let property, top slicing can be a strategy to enhance affordability. Explore further details on how to manage an unaffordable buy-to-let property through remortgaging.

Are buy to let mortgages interest only?

Interest-only mortgages are favoured by many landlords and buy-to-let mortgage providers, although not all buy-to-let mortgages operate on this basis. With an interest-only mortgage, you solely cover the interest during the mortgage term, with the principal loan amount due at the end. Typically, this entails selling the property to settle the outstanding loan, but the process can be more complex.

Alternatively, a repayment mortgage ensures full property ownership at the term’s end, offering the flexibility to retain or sell the property. This structure involves regular payments that gradually reduce the loan balance, culminating in full ownership upon completion of payments.

What deposit do I need for a buy to let?

Buy-to-let mortgages frequently cap the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio at approximately 75%, necessitating a minimum deposit of 25%. This deposit requirement surpasses that of residential properties, where 10% deposits are more prevalent.

While residential mortgages may accept 5% deposits via schemes like Deposit Unlock, or even offer 0% deposit mortgages through Savings as Security arrangements.

Are buy to let mortgages more expensive?

Buy-to-let mortgages often entail higher costs compared to standard residential mortgages. This is due to the typically larger deposit required and potentially higher interest rates, resulting in higher monthly repayments. Additionally, landlords incur additional expenses such as letting agent fees, legal and administration fees, maintenance costs, and increased taxes (including income tax and stamp duty).

Who can get a buy to let mortgage?

Buy-to-let mortgages are accessible to individuals who can meet the lender’s affordability criteria. However, due to the perceived higher risk compared to residential mortgages, applicants may encounter additional requirements. Some lenders restrict buy-to-let mortgages to investors who already own a home, either outright or through a residential mortgage. Nonetheless, securing a buy-to-let mortgage as a first-time buyer is feasible, as we’ll elaborate.

What impacts your ability to get a buy to let mortgage?

Several factors influence your eligibility for a buy-to-let mortgage, including your credit score, age, and whether you’re a first-time buyer.

Credit Score:

A good credit rating is typically required, with lenders assessing your financial stability. High levels of existing debt may limit your options.

Age Limits:

Individuals aged 50 or older might encounter challenges, as many lenders impose upper age limits, usually around 70 to 75. This age corresponds to the end of the mortgage term, not the application date. For instance, if you opt for a 25-year mortgage term with a lender having a 75-year age limit, you must be 50 or younger upon application. However, some lenders offer higher age limits or have no age restrictions.

Can first time buyers get a buy to let?

Getting a buy-to-let mortgage as a first-time buyer is feasible, but it comes with challenges to consider.

Larger Deposit:

Expect to save a substantial deposit compared to buying a property for personal use. With soaring house prices, saving for even a modest deposit can be daunting.

Stamp Duty Implications:

Unlike first-time buyers, you’ll miss out on stamp duty relief when purchasing a buy-to-let property. While you’ll still pay stamp duty, it won’t be as much as non-first-time buyers. However, if you later decide to buy a property for personal use while retaining your investment property, you’ll incur the full buy-to-let/second home surcharge.

Lifetime ISA Limitations:

Savings in a Lifetime ISA can’t be used for an investment property. Withdrawing savings for purposes other than a first home or retirement incurs a fee, diminishing your savings.

Now, exploring the advantages and disadvantages of purchasing a buy-to-let property as a first-time buyer:

Pros & cons of buying a buy to let as a first time buyer

Pros

Opting for property investment in a more affordable location allows you to diversify without relocating.
Rental income can supplement your living expenses or serve as a passive income stream.
First-time landlords may benefit from reduced stamp duty compared to seasoned investors.

Cons

You won’t qualify for first-time buyer stamp duty relief.
The Lifetime ISA bonus cannot be applied to a buy-to-let property.
Utilizing Lifetime ISA savings for buy-to-let incurs penalties.
Securing a residential mortgage later may be challenging due to existing buy-to-let obligations.

Is a buy to let worth it?

Investing in buy-to-let properties can offer substantial returns, providing a steady income and potential capital appreciation as property values rise. Yet, it comes with risks, and not everyone sees a significant return. Rent from tenants must cover not only mortgage payments but also various expenses like legal fees, maintenance, insurance, and taxes. Additionally, if you enlist a letting agent, their fees must be considered, potentially reducing overall profits.